PCP is targeted at the performance analyst, benchmarker, capacity planner, developer, database administrator, or system administrator with an interest in overall system performance and a need to quickly isolate and understand performance behavior, resource utilization, activity levels, and bottlenecks in complex systems. Platforms that can benefit from this level of performance analysis include large servers, server clusters, or multi-server sites delivering DBMS, compute, Web, file, or video services.

To deal efficiently with the dynamic behavior of complex systems, performance analysts need to filter out “noise” from the overwhelming stream of performance data, and focus on exceptional scenarios. Visualization of current and historical performance data, and automated reasoning about performance data, effectively provide this filtering.

From the PCP end user's perspective, PCP presents an integrated suite of tools, user interfaces, and services that support real-time and retrospective performance analysis, with a bias towards eliminating mundane information and focusing attention on the exceptional and extraordinary performance behaviors. When this is done, the user can concentrate on in-depth analysis or target management procedures, for those critical system performance problems.

At the lowest level, performance metrics are collected and managed in autonomous performance domains such as the IRIX operating system, a database management system, a layered service, or an end-user application. These domains feature a multitude of access control policies, access methods, data semantics, and multiversion support. All this detail is irrelevant to the developer or user of a performance monitoring tool, and is hidden by the PCP infrastructure.

Performance Metric Domain Agents (PMDAs) within PCP encapsulate the knowledge about, and export performance information from, autonomous performance domains.

Usability and extensibility of performance management tools mandate a single scheme for naming performance metrics. The set of defined names constitutes a Performance Metrics Name Space (PMNS). Within PCP, the PMNS is adaptive so it can be extended, reshaped, and pruned to meet the needs of particular applications and users.

PCP provides a single interface to name and retrieve values for all performance metrics, independently of their source or location.

From a purely pragmatic viewpoint, a single workstation must be able to monitor the concurrent performance of multiple remote hosts. At the same time, a single host may be subject to monitoring from multiple remote workstations.

These requirements suggest a classical client-server architecture, which is exactly what PCP uses to provide concurrent and multiconnected access to performance metrics, independent of their host location.

Complex systems are subject to continual changes as network connections fail and are re-established; nodes are taken out of service and rebooted; hardware is added and removed; and software is upgraded, installed, or removed. Often these changes are asynchronous and remote (perhaps in another geographic region or domain of administrative control).

The distributed nature of the PCP (and the modular fashion in which performance metrics domains can be installed, upgraded, and configured on different hosts) enables PCP to adapt concurrently to changes in the monitored system(s). Variations in the available performance metrics as a consequence of configuration changes are handled automatically and become visible to all clients as soon as the reconfigured host is rebooted or the responsible agent is restarted.

PCP also detects loss of client-server connections, and most clients support subsequent automated reconnection.

A range of tools is provided to support flexible, adaptive logging of performance metrics for archive, playback, remote diagnosis, and capacity planning. PCP archive logs may be accumulated either at the host being monitored, at a monitoring workstation, or both.

A universal replay mechanism, modeled on VCR controls, supports “stop, rewind, random seek, and replay at variable speed” processing of archived performance data.

Most PCP applications are able to process archive logs and real-time performance data with equal facility. Unification of real-time access and access to the archive logs, in conjunction with VCR service, provides new and powerful ways to build performance tools and to review both current and historical performance data.

For operational and production environments, PCP provides a framework with scripts to customize in order to automate the execution of ongoing tasks such as these:

PCP permits the integration of new performance metrics into the Performance Metrics Name Space (PMNS), the collection infrastructure, and the logging framework. The guiding principle is, “if it is important for monitoring system performance, and you can measure it, you can easily integrate it into the PCP framework.”

For many PCP customers, the most important performance metrics are not those already supported, but new performance metrics that characterize the essence of “good” or “bad” performance at their site, or within their particular application environment.

One example is an application that measures the round-trip time for a benign “probe” transaction against some mission-critical application.

For application developers, a library is provided to support easy-to-use insertion of trace and monitoring points within an application, and the automatic export of resultant performance data into the PCP framework. Other libraries and tools aid the development of customized and fully featured Performance Metrics Domain Agents (PMDAs).

Extensive source code examples are provided in the distribution, and by using the PCP toolkit and interfaces, these customized measures of performance or quality of service can be easily and seamlessly integrated into the PCP framework.

The following features are included in this release of Performance Co-Pilot:

These tools provide the principal services for the Performance Co-Pilot end-user with an interest in monitoring, visualizing, or processing performance information collected either in real time or from PCP archive logs:

Performance Co-Pilot provides the following tools to support real-time data collection, network transport, and archive log creation services for performance data:

Performance Co-Pilot provides the following tools to support the PCP infrastructure and assist operational procedures for PCP deployment in a production environment:

The following PCP tools aid the development of new programs to consume performance data, and new agents to export performance data within the PCP framework:

Across all of the supported performance metric domains, there are a large number of performance metrics. Each metric has its own structure and semantics. PCP presents a uniform interface to these metrics, independent of the underlying metric data source.

The Performance Metrics Name Space (PMNS) provides a hierarchical classification of external metric names, and a mapping from external names to internal metric identifiers. See “Performance Metrics Name Space” for a description of the PMNS.

When performance metric values are returned to a requesting application, there may be more than one value instance for a particular metric; for example, independent counts for each CPU, process, disk, or local filesystem. Internal instance identifiers correspond one to one with external (textual) descriptions of the members of an instance domain.

Transient performance metrics (such as per-process information, per-XLV volume, and so on) cause repeated requests for the same metric to return different numbers of values, or changes in the particular instance identifiers returned. These changes are expected and fully supported by the PCP infrastructure; however, metric instantiation is guaranteed to be valid only at the time of collection.

When performance metrics are retrieved, they are delivered in the context of a particular source of metrics, a point in time, and a profile of desired instances. This means that the application making the request has already negotiated to establish the context in which the request should be executed.

A metric source may be the current performance data from a particular host (a live or real-time source), or an archive log of performance data collected by pmlogger at some distant host or at an earlier time (a retrospective or archive source).

By default, the collection time for a performance metric is the current time of day for real-time sources, or current point within an archive source. For archives, the collection time may be reset to an arbitrary time within the bounds of the archive log.

---

Note: Performance Co-Pilot 2.0, along with IRIX release 6.5, have been developed to be completely Year 2000 compliant.

---

Instrumentation for the purpose of performance monitoring typically consists of counts of activity or events, attribution of resource consumption, and service-time or response-time measures. This instrumentation may exist in one or more of the following functional domains, each with an associated access method (see Figure 1-1):

For each domain, the set of performance metrics may be viewed as an abstract data type, with an associated set of methods that may be used to

We refer to each functional domain as a Performance Metrics Domain (PMD) and assume that PMDs are functionally, architecturally, and administratively independent and autonomous. Obviously the set of PMDs available on any host is variable, and changes with time as software and hardware are installed and removed.

The number of PMDs may be further enlarged in cluster-based or network-based configurations, where there is potentially an instance of each Performance Metrics Domain on each node. Hence, the management of PMDs must be both extensible at a particular host and distributed across a number of hosts.

Each PMD on a particular host must be assigned a unique PMD identifier. In practice, this means unique identifiers are assigned globally for each PMD type. For example, the same identifier would be used for the IRIX PMD on all hosts.

The performance metrics collection architecture is distributed, in the sense that any performance tool may be executing remotely. However, a PMDA must run on the system for which it is collecting performance measurements. In most cases, connecting these tools together on the collection host is the responsibility of the pmcd process, as shown in Figure 1-2.

The host running the monitoring tools does not require any collection tools, including pmcd, because all requests for metrics are sent to the pmcd process on the collector host. These requests are then forwarded to the appropriate PMDAs, which respond with metric descriptions, help text, and most importantly, metric values.

Figure 1-2. Process Structure for Distributed Operation

The connections between monitor clients and pmcd processes are managed in libpcp, below the PMAPI level; see PMAPI(3). Connections between PMDAs and pmcd are managed by the PMDA routines; see PMDA(3). There can be multiple monitor clients and multiple PMDAs on the one host, but there may be at most one pmcd process.

Internally, each unique performance metric is identified by a Performance Metric Identifier (PMID) drawn from a universal set of identifiers, including some that are reserved for site-specific, application-specific, and customer-specific use.

An external name space (the performance metrics name space, or PMNS) maps from a hierarchy (or tree) of external names to PMIDs.

Each node in the name space tree is assigned a label that must begin with an alphabet character, and be followed by zero or more alphanumeric characters or the underscore (_) character. The root node of the tree has the special label of root.

A metric name is formed by traversing the tree from the root to a leaf node with each node label on the path separated by a period. The common prefix root. is omitted from all names. For example, in the small subsection of a PMNS shown in Figure 1-3, the following are valid names for performance metrics:

irix.kernel.percpu.syscall
irix.network.tcp.rcvpack
hw.router.recv.total_util

Figure 1-3. Small Performance Metrics Name Space (PMNS)

Although a default PMNS is shipped and updated by the components of PCP, individual users may create their own name space for metrics of interest, and all tools may use a private PMNS, rather than the default PMNS.

---

Note: For some low-end bundles based on PCP (such as WebMeter in the WebFORCE products), the default PMNS cannot be modified, nor can an alternate PMNS be created.

---

Through the various Performance Metric Domains, the PCP must support a wide range of formats and semantics for performance metrics. This “metadata” describing the performance metrics includes

For each metric, this metadata is defined within the associated PMDA, and PCP arranges for the information to be exported to the performance tools applications that use the metadata when interpreting the values for performance metrics.

There are two types of performance metrics, single valued and set valued, described in the following sections.

Hosts supporting PCP services are broadly classified into two categories:

Collector—Hosts that have pmcd and one or more Performance Metric Domain Agents (PMDAs) running to collect and export performance metrics.

Monitor—Hosts that import performance metrics from one or more collector hosts to be consumed by tools to monitor, manage. or record the performance of the collector hosts.

Each PCP enabled host can operate as a collector, a monitor, or both.

Performance Co-Pilot provides an infrastructure through the Performance Metrics Collection System (PMCS). It unifies the autonomous and distributed PMDAs into a cohesive pool of performance data, and provides the services required to create generalized and powerful performance tools.

The PMCS provides the framework that underpins the PMAPI, which is described in the Performance Co-Pilot Programmer's Guide. The PMCS is responsible for the following services on behalf of the performance tools developed on top of the PMAPI:

The PMCS described in the previous section is used when PMAPI clients are requesting performance metrics from a real-time or live source.

The PMAPI also supports delivery of performance metrics from a historical source in the form of a PCP archive log. Archive logs are created using the pmlogger utility, and are “replayed” in an architecture as shown in Figure 1-4.

The PMAPI has been designed to minimize the differences required for an application to process performance data from an archive or from a real-time source. As a result, all PCP tools support live and retrospective monitoring with equal facility.

Figure 1-4. Architecture for Retrospective Analysis

Much of the PCP product's potential for attacking difficult performance problems in production environments comes from the design philosophy that considers extensibility to be critically important.

The performance analyst can take advantage of the PCP infrastructure to deploy value-added performance monitoring tools and services. Here are some examples: